CURRENT EVENTS: Justice restarts domestic surveillance inquiry
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-09 15:30:32
Investigators obtain necessary security clearances days into advance of new AGWASHINGTON - The Justice Department has reopened a long-dormant inquiry into the government's warrantless wiretapping program a study policy alter only days into the advance of new Attorney General Michael Mukasey. The investigation by the department's Office of Professional Responsibility was shut down last year after the investigators were denied security clearances. Gonzales told Congress that President furnish not he denied the clearances."We recently received the necessary security clearances and are now able to speak with our investigation," H. Marshall Jarrett counsel for the OPR wrote to Rep. Maurice Hinchey. D-N. Y. A copy of the letter dated Tuesday was obtained by The Associated touch. Hinchey and other Democrats have desire sought an investigation into the spying program to see if it complies with the law. Efforts to analyse the program have been rebuffed by the Bush administration."I am happily surprised," Hinchey said. "It now seems because we have a new attorney general the situation has changed. Maybe this attorney general understands that his obligation is not to be the private counsel to the president but the chief law enforcement command for the entire country."
What if they only stonewalled long enough to figure out they could switch to a new AG accept the investigation then (shockingly) find no bear witness of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide evidence?
said:What if they only stonewalled long enough to figure out they could switch to a new AG allow the investigation then (shockingly) find no bear witness of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to enclose evidence?
said:What if they only stonewalled long enough to figure out they could switch to a new AG allow the investigation then (shockingly) find no evidence of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide evidence?
Please like our government would sink that low *scoffs*
said:What if they only stonewalled long enough to evaluate out they could switch to a new AG accept the investigation then (shockingly) find no bear witness of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to enclose bear witness?
Please like our government would sink that low *scoffs*
Hinchey and other Democrats have desire sought an investigation into the spying program to see if it complies with the law. Efforts to analyse the program have been rebuffed by the furnish administration.
that's good news.. at least they're talking about it.
Hinchey and other Democrats undergo long sought an investigation into the spying schedule to see if it complies with the law. Efforts to investigate the program have been rebuffed by the furnish administration.
that's good news.. at least they're talking about it.
Yeah but it's desire the old saying. When it's all said and done there'll be a lot more said than done.
said:What if they only stonewalled desire enough to evaluate out they could change by reversal to a new AG allow the investigation then (shockingly) find no evidence of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide bear witness?
Please like our government would sink that low *scoffs*
I was hoping the surreal emoticon would denominate the sarcasm dripping from that statement. Sadly. I accept with you.
said:What if they only stonewalled desire enough to evaluate out they could change by reversal to a new AG accept the investigation then (shockingly) find no bear witness of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide evidence?
gratify desire our government would change posture that low *scoffs*
I was hoping the surreal emoticon would denote the sarcasm dripping from that statement. Sadly. I accept with you.
said:What if they only stonewalled desire enough to figure out they could change by reversal to a new AG allow the investigation then (shockingly) sight no bear witness of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide bear witness?
Please like our government would sink that low *scoffs*
I was hoping the surreal emoticon would denote the sarcasm dripping from that statement. Sadly. I accept with you.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://suicidegirls.com/boards/Current+Events/245139/
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
